🔗 Share this article

Established parties in power are more and more enabling the radical right to set the public discourse, as per a new study conducted in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Researchers found that this trend has inadvertently helped far-right parties by validating their viewpoints and spreading them to a broader audience.

Analysis Drawing from Two Decades of Media Reporting

The results, published in the academic journal on political studies, utilized an automated text analysis of over 520,000 articles from six German newspapers.

Capital-based researchers observed that as the far right moved from marginal topics in the 1990s era to core subjects like assimilation and migration, mainstream political groups progressively adjusted their communication in reaction.

This adjustment amplified the dissemination of these concepts and signaled to voters that such positions were acceptable.

Consequences for Democracy

"Public communication by established political groups plays a central role in the electoral success of the radical right," stated a political sociologist involved in the research.

"This factor has been overlooked," she added.

The impact was noticeable even when conventional groups were condemning the radical faction. "You're still giving them attention," the expert remarked. "The main point is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this attention is key."

Mainstreaming Effect Throughout the Continent

While the research was centered around the German context, this normalisation effect is probable to apply to countries throughout the European continent.

"This is frequently observed in German and British media," explained another co-author. "The far right says something and everybody starts talking about it for one week."

"Even if you're countering it, you're echoing it," he stated.

Toughening of Public Discourse

At certain points, leaders have also toughened their language to match that of the far right.

In a recent discussion, a former national leader advocated widespread expulsions and urged them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Similar examples can be observed throughout the continent, as politicians from nations ranging from the UK to France adopt the rhetoric of the radical right, especially on immigration.

This has created an feedback loop that was unthinkable a ten years prior.

Core Issue: Who Sets the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist political group and you are discussing cultural issues – immigration, integration – in a way that is determined by the pace of the radical right, that's the essence of narrative control," explained a researcher.

Other parties have taken additional measures, seeking to copy the hardline platform of the far right, despite studies indicates that doing so leads voters to vote for the radical faction.

Progressive Influence and Voter Awareness

The extent of data gathered revealed that the influence of far-right parties had been progressive and had grown over time.

"Public perception doesn't change from one day to another," commented a co-author. "But if you encounter this negative framing around immigration frequently, and it is being disseminated not only by far-right parties but also, for example, by mainstream political organizations, then of course this storyline travels further."

Requirement for Mainstream Parties to Develop Their Own Discourses

The study emphasized the need for mainstream parties to develop their distinct narratives, particularly on subjects such as migration and integration, rather than continuously trailing after the far right.

"It's like a dance," said one researcher. "If the conductor is radical and you're responding to them, you lose the ability to choose which tune should be heard."