🔗 Share this article

Internationally, nations are investing hundreds of billions into what is known as “sovereign AI” – building domestic artificial intelligence technologies. From Singapore to Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, nations are vying to create AI that comprehends local languages and local customs.

The International AI Battle

This initiative is part of a larger international competition spearheaded by tech giants from the America and the People's Republic of China. Whereas firms like OpenAI and a social media giant invest enormous resources, mid-sized nations are likewise making independent bets in the AI field.

However with such huge amounts involved, can smaller countries achieve notable advantages? As stated by an expert from an influential thinktank, If not you’re a affluent state or a large firm, it’s quite a hardship to develop an LLM from nothing.”

Security Issues

Many nations are hesitant to rely on overseas AI systems. Throughout the Indian subcontinent, as an example, US-built AI tools have at times been insufficient. One example featured an AI tool deployed to educate pupils in a remote community – it spoke in English with a thick Western inflection that was hard to understand for local users.

Then there’s the national security factor. In India’s military authorities, relying on certain international systems is viewed unacceptable. As one founder noted, “It could have some unvetted learning material that could claim that, oh, Ladakh is separate from India … Employing that certain system in a military context is a big no-no.”

He continued, “I have spoken to people who are in security. They aim to use AI, but, disregarding certain models, they are reluctant to rely on US technologies because details may be transferred outside the country, and that is totally inappropriate with them.”

National Projects

Consequently, a number of states are supporting local initiatives. An example such effort is underway in India, in which an organization is attempting to develop a national LLM with public funding. This effort has allocated approximately $1.25bn to AI development.

The developer envisions a model that is significantly smaller than leading tools from US and Chinese tech companies. He notes that India will have to offset the financial disparity with talent. Based in India, we don’t have the advantage of allocating huge sums into it,” he says. “How do we vie versus for example the $100 or $300 or $500bn that the US is investing? I think that is where the core expertise and the intellectual challenge comes in.”

Regional Emphasis

Across Singapore, a government initiative is funding machine learning tools educated in the region's regional languages. These tongues – for example the Malay language, Thai, the Lao language, Bahasa Indonesia, the Khmer language and others – are commonly poorly represented in American and Asian LLMs.

I wish the individuals who are developing these independent AI systems were aware of how rapidly and how quickly the cutting edge is advancing.

An executive engaged in the initiative says that these models are created to complement more extensive models, instead of replacing them. Systems such as a popular AI tool and Gemini, he says, commonly have difficulty with local dialects and cultural aspects – communicating in stilted Khmer, for example, or recommending pork-based recipes to Malaysian users.

Creating regional-language LLMs allows local governments to code in cultural sensitivity – and at least be “informed users” of a powerful system built elsewhere.

He adds, I am cautious with the concept sovereign. I think what we’re aiming to convey is we want to be better represented and we wish to understand the features” of AI technologies.

Cross-Border Cooperation

Regarding countries trying to establish a position in an growing international arena, there’s a different approach: join forces. Analysts associated with a prominent policy school recently proposed a government-backed AI initiative allocated across a group of emerging countries.

They call the proposal “a collaborative AI effort”, in reference to the European successful play to create a alternative to a major aerospace firm in the mid-20th century. This idea would involve the establishment of a public AI company that would combine the capabilities of various countries’ AI initiatives – including the United Kingdom, Spain, the Canadian government, Germany, Japan, Singapore, the Republic of Korea, France, Switzerland and Sweden – to create a viable alternative to the US and Chinese leaders.

The primary researcher of a paper describing the concept states that the proposal has gained the attention of AI ministers of at least three states so far, along with several national AI organizations. While it is currently targeting “mid-sized nations”, emerging economies – Mongolia and Rwanda included – have additionally indicated willingness.

He comments, In today’s climate, I think it’s simply reality there’s diminished faith in the promises of this current White House. Experts are questioning for example, should we trust such systems? In case they decide to