🔗 Share this article Apple may be forced to allow rival app stores within the United Kingdom. Apple could be required to allow rivals to operate their own app stores on iPhones across Britain, following a ruling from the market watchdog. This would be a significant change to Apple's infamous "closed system" where applications can only be downloaded from the company's official marketplace. But the UK competition watchdog has classified both Apple and Google as having "strategic market status" - indicating they have a lot of power over mobile platforms. Watchdog Findings The regulator said the tech firms "could be restricting progress and market rivalry". But the regulator clarified it did not "find or assume misconduct" from the firms. "Mobile applications generates 1.5% of the British economy and sustains around four hundred thousand positions, which is why it's essential these sectors function properly for enterprises," commented a senior official from the CMA. Around 90-100% of UK mobile devices operate using the two tech companies' mobile platforms, creating what the regulator calls an "effective duopoly". According to current data, 48.5% of UK mobile owners use an Apple device - which runs Apple's iOS - with the overwhelming bulk of the remaining users using Google's Android. Apple's Reaction The regulatory probe examined how dominant Apple and Google's own applications are compared with competitors - as well as their web applications and platform software. It is unknown what modifications the regulator will look to request, but previously it published guidelines detailing potential measures it could take. These comprise requiring it to be easier for people to switch between Apple and Android devices, and for both companies to list applications "fairly and openly" in their app stores. Apple specifically may be compelled to permit alternative app stores on its products, and let people to download programs straight from developer sites. This would mirror a similar ruling in the EU, which previously imposed measures against Apple for restrictive practices. The technology firm warned the UK could lose access to receiving updates - as has happened in the European Union - which the company attributes to heavy regulation. For example, some Apple Intelligence features which have been launched in other regions are not available in the European market. "Apple faces fierce competition in every sector where we operate, and we work tirelessly to create the best products, solutions and customer interface," the organization said in a release. "Britain's implementation of European regulations would weaken that, resulting in consumers with weaker privacy and security, slower availability to new features, and a fragmented, less seamless experience." The Search Giant's Standpoint Android users can presently use third-party app stores - though critics say they are not as smooth as Google's own Play Store. The CMA's roadmap said Google may have to "change the user experience" of downloading apps straight from online sources, as well as "remove user frictions" when using third-party platforms. "There appears to be no the rationale for today's designation decision," a company competition lead remarked. The representative said "the majority" of Android users use third-party platforms or download apps straight from a creator's site, and claimed there is a much wider selection of applications offered for Android users compared to those on Apple devices. "There are now 24,000 Android phone models from thirteen hundred phone manufacturers globally, facing intense competition from Apple's platform in the United Kingdom," the spokesperson continued. Android is an freely available software, which means developers can utilize and develop on top of it for no cost. Google argues this means it promotes competition. But advocacy organizations said restrictions on these firms' dominance in different nations "are already helping businesses to develop and giving consumers more options". "Their dominance is now creating genuine problems by restricting choice for consumers and market rivalry for businesses," commented a consumer advocate.