🔗 Share this article

I have a few opinions regarding the comments delivered by ESPN broadcaster a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's win over Taylor Fritz in the New York major quarter-finals. Consider – Fritz is American, the commentator is from the US – and sports often encourage patriotic sentiment. A little bit of letdown was understandable. Rather, Fowler invoked the ongoing drought of American men at grand slam tournaments: none of them had lifted a trophy since the last American champion in 2003, and Fritz had been the final representative in the competition.

We all enjoy a narrative, me too. But come on. Suppose the American had beaten Djokovic for the first time, force of nature Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, whom he has never defeated in an official match. And had he someway survived that, it would have been title holder Jannik Sinner, against whom Fritz had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also divided the last seven major titles (and the Spaniard proceeded to thrash a fatigued Serbian in the subsequent match). He said in post-match interviews following his defeat that he actually liked his draw, because it offered the chance to defeat the top three competitors in the world in succession. Fritz is more than justified to aim for the accomplishment; an athlete is meant to believe in themselves. But going into that Serbian quarter-final what other person sensibly had the lack of American champions in mind?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier between her and consistent victories

The American, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the world starting this week’s year-end championships and has won his last six encounters over No 3 Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that at present, that’s as high as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a vast gap of ranking points away. Fritz’s top-class delivery and powerful power on both forehand and reverse side are more than enough to defeat most rivals on the professional circuit. Against the select few once-in-a-lifetime players, however, Fritz is often helpless. The last several years has seen the interesting emergence of tall, gangly players who can nonetheless move around with the surprising speed and fluidity of smaller players. He is 6ft 5ins and looks it. His footwork is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he seldom steal a point that the other player was dictating, and hitting a soft shot versus him is usually a safe bet. That serves as a pretty harsh limitation on his upside.

Fritz has made a number of dramatic, unexpected improvements over the years. At the beginning of the decade, he was circling the lower end of the top 30. 24 months later, he was sniffing the top 10. Last year, he suddenly surged to fourth place – and held the spot. But the next leap, competing against and beating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, Sinner, and even a declining Djokovic, is the highest of all. What was Fowler have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the ongoing drought of US male players winning grand slams when Fritz had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the task too little.

Taylor Fritz achieved a career-best advancement to the All England Club last four in the summer.

Fritz’s play in that very quarter-final should have been enough of an indication. Djokovic won in four rounds, a win that only felt uncertain for moments towards the very end, when the American had saved a few match points and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the rallies, with Fritz earning numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved service break opportunity after service break opportunity, extending the run to the brink of agony. When he eventually did claim one of the chances at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a terrible game to drop serve once more; the Serbian had lulled him into a battle secondary to the real battle and forced him to expend excessive energy to win it. Down match points in the last game, Fritz’s first serve floated to the sky. He prolonged the match twice on his backup delivery, but ultimately double-faulted. It was not a collapse, in my opinion, only a consequence of having to hit an excessive number of second serves.

The contest was quite ironclad proof that Fritz is insufficiently skilled to beat any form of Djokovic, that was defeated by the Spaniard in the following match and never particularly appeared like he believed he could win. This is perfectly fine – the Serbian is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the height of his athletic abilities now, but has developed sufficient experience and tactical know-how to make up for a significant portion of the decline. The problem is the individuals who were anticipating the American to win, and pressuring him to do so, when he was yet to done anything that indicated he would.

The American is an valuable contributor to the tour nonetheless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in press conferences, exceeding almost anyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, prepared to not only say how he feels or the strategy he believed decided a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the blame for America not spawn a male major champion since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Since the fellow American is competing alongside him in the rankings, maybe they can divide that load.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• Lorenzo Musetti (It)

Bjorn Borg Group

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• The rising American
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I would likely think about it forever if I don’t do it,” the American informed an interviewer in the summer of winning a major. I hope he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t fulfill that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact extremely improbable for all other players. {